A Hilbert Transform Based Shear Wave Speed Estimation Method for Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging

Authors

  • Mohammed A Hassan Dept of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Egypt
  • Nancy M Salem Dept of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Egypt
  • Mohamed I El-Adawy Dept of Electronics, Communications, and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14738/jbemi.26.1585

Keywords:

Shear wave elasticity imaging, acoustic radiation force, finite element method, shear wave speed estimation, lateral Time to Peak, Gaussian fitting

Abstract

In this paper, a Hilbert transform based method is used to estimate shear wave speed. Shear wave speed can be measured from the lateral propagation of particle displacements or velocities within the tissue, these particle displacements or velocities are generated by simulating radio frequency signals measured from ultrasound probe elements that image the displaced particles generated from a finite-element model (FEM) that simulates the dynamic response of tissues to acoustic radiation forces. The proposed shear wave speed estimation method is based on locating a zero-amplitude crossing in the Hilbert transform of the cross-correlation function between the particle displacement measured at first lateral location greater than the lateral width of shear wave and the displacement measured and subsequent lateral lines under examination at a certain depth. The results obtained from this method is compared to the lateral Time to Peak (TTP) method that finds the instance at which the maximum displacement is detected at each lateral location under examination at a certain depth. The proposed algorithm reveals a reconstruction of materials having shear modulus of 1.43±0.20, 2.92±0.39, 4.09±0.54, 8.13±1.06, 12.11±1.52, 16.16±2.08 kPa on particle displacement signals for 1.33, 2.835, 4, 8, 12, and 16 kPa shear moduli materials respectively and 1.34±0.40, 2.66±0.41, 3.77±0.58, 7.45±1.14, 11.34±1.51, and 14.90±2.08 kPa on particle velocity signals for 1.33, 2.835, 4, 8, 12, and 16 kPa shear moduli materials respectively. Finally, the proposed method is based on locating a zero-amplitude crossing in the Hilbert transform of the cross-correlation function appears to provide more accurate results than Lateral TTP method.

References

(1) Wells, P.N.T. And H.-D. Liang, medical ultrasound: imaging of soft tissue strain and elasticity. Journal of the royal society interface, 2011. 8(64): p. 1521-1549.

(2) Sarvazyan, A., Et Al., Elasticity Imaging-An Emerging Branch of Medical Imaging. An Overview. Curr. Med. Imaging Rev, 2011. 7(4): P. 255-282.

(3) Greenleaf, J.F., M. Fatemi, and M. Insana, Selected Methods for Imaging Elastic Properties of Biological Tissues. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2003. 5(1): P. 57-78.

(4) Garra, B.S., Et Al., Elastography of Breast Lesions: Initial Clinical Results. Radiology, 1997. 202(1): P. 79-86.

(5) Burnside, E.S., Et Al., Differentiating Benign From Malignant Solid Breast Masses with Us Strain Imaging1. Radiology, 2007. 245(2): P. 401-410.

(6) Miyanaga, N., Et Al., Tissue Elasticity Imaging For Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Preliminary Report. International Journal of Urology, 2006. 13(12): P. 1514-1518.

(7) De Korte, C.L., Et Al., Characterization of Plaque Components with Intravascular Ultrasound Elastography in Human Femoral and Coronary Arteries in Vitro. Circulation, 2000. 102(6): P. 617-623.

(8) Emelianov, S., Et Al., Triplex Ultrasound: Elasticity Imaging To Age Deep Venous Thrombosis. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2002. 28(6): P. 757-767.

(9) Vogt, M. And H. Ermert, Development And Evaluation Of A High-Frequency Ultrasound-Based System For In Vivo Strain Imaging Of The Skin. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE

Transactions On, 2005. 52(3): P. 375-385.

(10) Kaluzynski, K., Et Al., Strain Rate Imaging Using Two-Dimensional Speckle Tracking. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEE Transactions On, 2001. 48(4): P. 1111-1123.

(11) Treece, G., Et Al., Real-Time Quasi-Static Ultrasound Elastography. Interface Focus, 2011. 1(4): P. 540-552.

(12) Rosenzweig, S., M. Palmeri, And K. Nightingale, Analysis of Rapid Multi-Focal-Zone Arfi Imaging. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions On, 2015. 62(2): P. 280-289.

(13) Foucher, J., Et Al., Diagnosis of Cirrhosis by Transient Elastography (Fibroscan): A Prospective Study. Gut, 2006. 55(3): P. 403-408.

(14) Nyborg, W., Acoustic Streaming. Physical Acoustics, 1965. 2(Pt B): P. 265.

(15) Anderson, P.G., N.C. Rouze, And M.L. Palmeri, Effect Of Graphite Concentration On Shear-Wave Speed In Gelatin-Based Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms. Ultrasonic Imaging, 2011. 33(2): P. 134-142.

(16) Sarvazyan, A.P., Et Al., Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging: A New Ultrasonic Technology Of Medical Diagnostics. Ultrasound In Medicine & Biology, 1998. 24(9): P. 1419-1435.

(17) Palmeri, M.L., Et Al., A Finite-Element Method Model of Soft Tissue Response to Impulsive Acoustic Radiation Force. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions On, 2005. 52(10): P. 1699-1712.

(18) Nightingale, K., R. Bentley, and G. Trahey, Observations of Tissue Response To Acoustic Radiation Force: Opportunities For Imaging. Ultrasonic Imaging, 2002. 24(3): P. 129-138.

(19) Palmeri, M., Et Al., Evaluating The Feasibility Of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging Of The Uterine Cervix With An Intracavity Array: A Simulation Study. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions On, 2013. 60(10).

(20) Sinkus, R., Et Al., Viscoelastic Shear Properties Of In Vivo Breast Lesions Measured By Mr Elastography. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2005. 23(2): P. 159-165.

(21) Oliphant, T.E., Et Al., Complex‐Valued Stiffness Reconstruction for Magnetic Resonance Elastography by Algebraic Inversion of the Differential Equation. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2001. 45(2): P. 299-310.

(22) Bercoff, J., M. Tanter, and M. Fink, Supersonic Shear Imaging: A New Technique for Soft Tissue Elasticity Mapping. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions On, 2004. 51(4): P. 396-409.

(23) Sandrin, L., Et Al., Shear Modulus Imaging With 2-D Transient Elastography. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, Ieee Transactions On, 2002. 49(4): P. 426-435.

(24) Nightingale, K., S. Mcaleavey, and G. Trahey, Shear-Wave Generation Using Acoustic Radiation Force: In Vivo and Ex Vivo Results. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2003. 29(12): P. 1715-1723.

(25) Yin, M., Et Al., Assessment of Hepatic Fibrosis with Magnetic Resonance Elastography. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2007. 5(10): P. 1207-1213. E2.

(26) Chen, S., M. Fatemi, And J.F. Greenleaf, Quantifying Elasticity And Viscosity From Measurement Of Shear Wave Speed Dispersion. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2004. 115: P. 2781.

(27) Mcaleavey, S.A., M. Menon, And J. Orszulak, Shear-Modulus Estimation By Application Of Spatially-Modulated Impulsive Acoustic Radiation Force. Ultrasonic Imaging, 2007. 29(2): P. 87-104.

(28) Sandrin, L., Et Al., Transient Elastography: A New Noninvasive Method for Assessment of Hepatic Fibrosis. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2003. 29(12): P. 1705-1713.

(29) Mclaughlin, J. And D. Renzi, Using Level Set Based Inversion Of Arrival Times To Recover Shear Wave Speed In Transient Elastography And Supersonic Imaging. Inverse Problems, 2006. 22(2): P. 707.

(30) Tanter, M., Et Al., Quantitative Assessment Of Breast Lesion Viscoelasticity: Initial Clinical Results Using Supersonic Shear Imaging. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2008. 34(9): P. 1373-1386.

(31) Palmeri, M.L., Et Al., Quantifying Hepatic Shear Modulus In Vivo Using Acoustic Radiation Force. Ultrasound In Medicine And Biology, 2008. 34(4): P. 546-558.

(32) Jensen, J.A. And N.B. Svendsen, Calculation of Pressure Fields from Arbitrarily Shaped, Apodized, and Excited Ultrasound Transducers. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions On, 1992. 39(2): P. 262-267.

(33) Ls-Dyna3d 3.1. [Computer Program].]. Available From: Http://Www.Lstc.Com.

(34) Ls-Prepost. [Computer Program].]. Available From: Http://Www.Lstc.Com.

(35) Fahey, B.J., Et Al., Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging of the Abdomen: Demonstration of Feasibility and Utility. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2005. 31(9): P. 1185-1198.

(36) Altair Hypermesh. [Computer Program]]. Available From: Http://Www.Altairhyperworks.Com.

(37) Hughes, T.J., The Finite Element Method: Linear Static And Dynamic Finite Element Analysis. Prentiss-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, Nj, 1987.

(38) Palmeri, M.L., Et Al., Ultrasonic Tracking Of Acoustic Radiation Force-Induced Displacements In Homogeneous Media. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonic Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 2006. 53(7): P. 1300-1313.

(39) Pinton, G.F., J.J. Dahl, and G.E. Trahey, Rapid Tracking of Small Displacements with Ultrasound. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, Ieee Transactions On, 2006. 53(6): P. 1103-1117.

(40) Saad, Z.S., E.A. Deyoe, and K.M. Ropella, Estimation of Fmri Response Delays. Neuroimage, 2003. 18(2): P. 494-504.

(41) Rouze, N.C., Et Al., Parameters Affecting the Resolution and Accuracy of 2-D Quantitative Shear Wave Images. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions On, 2012. 59(8): P. 1729-1740.

(42) Modamio, V., Et Al., Digital Pulse-Timing Technique for The Neutron Detector Array Neda. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 2015. 775: P. 71-76.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-04

How to Cite

Hassan, M. A., Salem, N. M., & El-Adawy, M. I. (2016). A Hilbert Transform Based Shear Wave Speed Estimation Method for Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging. British Journal of Healthcare and Medical Research, 2(6), 08. https://doi.org/10.14738/jbemi.26.1585